In this edition
- Washington, Massachusetts create special enrollment periods; California, DC, and Maryland residents can also still enroll
- States require or ask insurers to cover cost of COVID-19 testing
- IRS allows HDHPs to cover COVID-19 testing, treatment pre-deductible
- States announce voluntary coverage by insurers
- New Mexico opens high-risk pool uninsured residents diagnosed with virus
- North Carolina making adjustments to its Medicaid program to address COVID-19
- 23 states and DC declare a state of emergency
How states are taking steps to improve health coverage in response to the Coronavirus
COVID-19 has dominated the news for the last few weeks, with concern levels ramping up rapidly in the last several days. The situation is very much in flux, with drastic changes and updates happening constantly. But states have had varying responses, ranging from a very hands-off, wait-and-see protocol, to much more involved, proactive approaches.
Washington, Massachusetts create special enrollment periods
Open enrollment for 2020 health coverage ended several weeks ago, but uninsured residents in two states now have new enrollment opportunities created in response to the evolving COVID-19 crisis:
- Washington’s state-run exchange has created a special enrollment period, triggered by the COVID-19 outbreak, during which uninsured residents can sign up for health insurance. It continues until April 8, and allows people who are uninsured to purchase a plan in the exchange with an April 1 effective date.
- The state-run exchange in Massachusetts has also opened up a special enrollment period related to the COVID-19 epidemic. It will continue until April 25. Enrollments completed by March 23 will have coverage effective April 1.
- Uninsured residents who live in California, the District of Columbia, or Maryland also still have an opportunity to enroll in coverage for 2020. The special enrollment periods in these states are unrelated to coronavirus, but still present an excellent opportunity for residents to make sure they have coverage in place for the rest of the year — important anytime, but especially in the face of a pandemic.
States require or ask insurers to cover cost of COVID-19 testing
In America’s patchwork health coverage system, cost is often an obstacle when people need health care. To address this, ten states have ordered state-regulated health plans to provide COVID-19 testing with no cost-sharing:
- Massachusetts (includes zero-cost-sharing treatment as well, at a doctor’s office, urgent care clinic, or ER)
- New Jersey
- New York
- Washington (regulation also applies to short-term health insurance in Washington)
Numerous other states are asking insurers to cover testing without cost-sharing, but have stopped short of requiring them to do so:
- New Mexico
- North Dakota
- West Virginia
Many of these state bulletins also require or ask insurers to promote telehealth visits for COVID-19, and to allow patients to refill their prescriptions early, in order to prepare for a potential quarantine.
But it’s important to understand that state requirements only apply to state-regulated health plans, and self-insured group plans are regulated by the federal government rather than the state governments.
Well over half of workers with employer-sponsored health plans are covered under self-insured plans. For these plans, the employer – rather than an insurance company – is funding employees’ health care costs, and state health insurance requirements do not apply.
U.S. House Democrats have unveiled a bill that would require all health plans – including self-insured plans – to cover COVID-19 testing. But for the time being, even if you’re in a state that is requiring health plans to fully cover the cost of COVID-19 testing, you’ll want to talk with your employer to determine the details of your coverage if you have an employer-sponsored plan.
You’ll also want to keep in mind that “covered” doesn’t mean “free.” If a state is requiring an insurer to cover the full cost of something (eg, COVID-19 testing, telehealth for COVID-19 treatment, a future vaccine, etc.) they will say something along the lines of “covered with no cost-sharing.” So although the federal government has confirmed that COVID-19 testing falls under the umbrella of essential health benefits, insurers can still apply a plan’s normal cost-sharing requirements (deductible, copays, coinsurance) unless a state has otherwise forbidden it. And large group plans don’t have to include coverage for essential health benefits at all, which further complicates the federal messaging.
But most insurers are offering free COVID-19 testing for members on non-self-insured plans, even in states that aren’t requiring it. However, people who contract COVID-19 and end up needing inpatient care will generally find that they’re on the hook for their plan’s entire maximum out-of-pocket, which can be as high as $8,150 for a single person in 2020. Almost all of the headlines about eliminating cost-sharing have been in reference to testing – and in some cases, telehealth visits – whereas treatment will fall under a plan’s normal cost-sharing rules.
UPDATE: Under intense pressure from Rep. Katie Porter (D, California), CDC Director Robert Redfield has agreed that the CDC will cover the cost of coronavirus testing for people whose health insurance doesn’t cover it, including those without health insurance (treatment, however, would still be an out-of-pocket cost for people without health insurance if they’re diagnosed with the virus).
IRS allows HDHPs to cover COVID-19 testing, treatment pre-deductible
The coverage that can be provided under HSA-qualified high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) is strictly regulated by the IRS. These plans have to comply with minimum deductibles that are set each year by the IRS, and they cannot pay for any services other than preventive care until that minimum deductible is met. But in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the IRS has now clarified that HDHPs can cover testing and treatment for the disease before the deductible, without the plan losing its HDHP status.
The IRS issued similar transitional relief in 2018, for people in states where health plans were required to cover male contraception with no cost-sharing, so this was not unexpected. But it does help to have clarification that health plans will not lose their HDHP status if they pay for Covid-related care pre-deductible.
States announce voluntary coverage by insurers
Several state insurance departments have announced that some or all of the insurers in their state have voluntarily agreed to cover COVID-19 testing without any cost-sharing:
New Mexico opens high-risk pool to uninsured residents diagnosed with virus
New Mexico has opened up its high-risk pool for uninsured residents who are diagnosed with COVID-19 and unable to obtain other coverage.
North Carolina Medicaid improvements to address COVID-19
North Carolina has announced changes to its Medicaid program to address COVID-19 concerns. The improvements include an increased focus on telehealth, easier access to increased quantities of medications, and easier access to oxygen and related equipment and supplies.
23 states declare a state of emergency
Declaring a state of emergency is a tool that states can use in situations like this, and there’s a rapidly growing list of states that are doing so. Among other things, a state of emergency allows a state to free up money and resources, avoid various rules that would otherwise apply, and better coordinate actions of various state agencies.
Emergency declarations can waive competitive bidding processes and other bureaucratic requirements, helping to expedite local health departments’ ability to respond as quickly as possible to public health needs. They can also allow testing by people who aren’t doctors or nurses, expanding states’ ability to provide extensive testing services.
At least 23 states and the District of Columbia had declared a state of emergency or public health emergency over COVID-19 as of Wednesday:
- District of Columbia
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
- Rhode Island
A national public health emergency was declared by HHS in late January, and numerous counties, mainly on the west coast, have also declared states of emergency. But President Trump is reluctant to issue a full emergency declaration — which would bring in the Federal Emergency Management Agency and extensive additional federal funding — because it would run counter to the approach he’s been taking thus far, which is to downplay the seriousness of the situation.
Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.